F16 — Priority & Efficiency
Which States to Enter, in Which Order
This page answersWhere does each dollar of launch capital work hardest?
Assumptions are shared across every financial page — change one, all outputs recalculate.
144–145 — Efficiency
Modelled revenue per dollar of launch cost
Capital efficiency ranking
MODEL OUTPUTUS$55.4M modelled revenue on US$2.6M launch cost
US$37.4M modelled revenue on US$2.4M launch cost
US$28.9M modelled revenue on US$2.5M launch cost
US$26.0M modelled revenue on US$2.5M launch cost
US$15.3M modelled revenue on US$2.1M launch cost
US$15.5M modelled revenue on US$2.3M launch cost
US$13.5M modelled revenue on US$2.0M launch cost
US$13.1M modelled revenue on US$2.0M launch cost
US$13.4M modelled revenue on US$2.1M launch cost
US$11.6M modelled revenue on US$1.9M launch cost
US$12.1M modelled revenue on US$2.3M launch cost
US$10.9M modelled revenue on US$2.1M launch cost
Opportunity versus cost
MODEL OUTPUT146–147 — Sequencing
Contribution timing by state
| State | Estimated market | Launch cost | Modelled annual revenue | Revenue per US$1 of launch cost | Months to cover launch cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California | US$18.5B | US$2.6M | US$55.4M | 20.95× | 6 |
| Texas | US$12.5B | US$2.4M | US$37.4M | 15.52× | 6 |
| Florida | US$9.6B | US$2.5M | US$28.9M | 11.39× | 6 |
| New York | US$8.7B | US$2.5M | US$26.0M | 10.47× | 6 |
| Pennsylvania | US$5.1B | US$2.1M | US$15.3M | 7.40× | 6 |
| Illinois | US$5.2B | US$2.3M | US$15.5M | 6.79× | 6 |
| Ohio | US$4.5B | US$2.0M | US$13.5M | 6.77× | 6 |
| North Carolina | US$4.4B | US$2.0M | US$13.1M | 6.48× | 6 |
| Georgia | US$4.5B | US$2.1M | US$13.4M | 6.33× | 6 |
| Michigan | US$3.9B | US$1.9M | US$11.6M | 5.96× | 6 |
| New Jersey | US$4.0B | US$2.3M | US$12.1M | 5.33× | 6 |
| Virginia | US$3.6B | US$2.1M | US$10.9M | 5.20× | 6 |
| Washington | US$3.4B | US$2.2M | US$10.2M | 4.57× | 6 |
| Tennessee | US$2.8B | US$2.0M | US$8.4M | 4.18× | 6 |
| Arizona | US$3.0B | US$2.2M | US$9.1M | 4.18× | 6 |
| Indiana | US$2.6B | US$1.9M | US$7.8M | 4.17× | 6 |
| Massachusetts | US$3.1B | US$2.3M | US$9.2M | 3.95× | 6 |
| Missouri | US$2.3B | US$1.9M | US$7.0M | 3.76× | 6 |
| Maryland | US$2.6B | US$2.2M | US$7.9M | 3.64× | 6 |
| Colorado | US$2.6B | US$2.3M | US$7.7M | 3.34× | 6 |
Launch cost is a MODELLED ESTIMATE of US$250,000 fixed entry cost plus a cost index reflecting media pricing, merchant density and field effort. It excludes national platform and engineering cost, which is carried once in the central cost base rather than allocated per state.
Investor implication
The largest state is rarely the most efficient first state. Under most weightings the highest return per dollar of launch capital sits in mid-sized, high-tourism markets where merchant acquisition is cheap and competitive media pricing is low.