PawPals USA

F15 — State Financial Database

Fifty States, Modelled Individually

This page answersWhere is the money, and where is it cheapest to reach?

Population is VERIFIED. Pet household counts, market values, insurance shares and cost indices are MODELLED ESTIMATES built from stated multipliers.

Scenario

Assumptions are shared across every financial page — change one, all outputs recalculate.

136–139 — Estimation model

Weighting model and geographic view

Model weights

ASSUMPTION
30
20
15
10
10
10
5

Geographic view

MODEL OUTPUTLOW CONFIDENCE
AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
RI
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
HI
TX
FL

Shading shows relative estimated market. For cost views, darker means cheaper.

140–143 — Ranked database

Full 50-state financial table

StatePopulation 2025Pet householdsEstimated marketInsurance shareAddressable merchantsCAC indexLaunch cost indexModelled revenue potential
California39,360,00010,349,641US$18.5B18.30%72,4229092US$55.4M
Texas31,710,0008,338,088US$12.5B5.50%55,8108183US$37.4M
Florida23,460,0006,168,765US$9.6B6.30%43,6368288US$28.9M
New York20,000,0005,258,964US$8.7B7.20%36,0008386US$26.0M
Illinois12,720,0003,344,701US$5.2B3.48%20,8618178US$15.5M
Pennsylvania13,060,0003,434,104US$5.1B3.53%19,5907670US$15.3M
Ohio11,900,0003,129,084US$4.5B3.16%17,3747467US$13.5M
Georgia11,300,0002,971,315US$4.5B3.05%17,8547572US$13.4M
North Carolina11,200,0002,945,020US$4.4B2.99%17,0247268US$13.1M
New Jersey9,550,0002,511,155US$4.0B2.77%14,5168978US$12.1M
Michigan10,130,0002,663,665US$3.9B2.70%14,5877365US$11.6M
Virginia8,880,0002,334,980US$3.6B2.49%13,3207971US$10.9M
Washington8,000,0002,103,586US$3.4B2.28%12,4808376US$10.2M
Massachusetts7,150,0001,880,080US$3.1B2.07%11,2978880US$9.2M
Arizona7,620,0002,003,665US$3.0B2.05%11,8878074US$9.1M
Tennessee7,320,0001,924,781US$2.8B1.93%11,4197068US$8.4M
Maryland6,263,2201,646,902US$2.6B1.82%9,2708574US$7.9M
Indiana6,924,2751,820,726US$2.6B1.84%9,5557262US$7.8M
Colorado6,010,0001,580,319US$2.6B1.70%9,7368379US$7.7M
Missouri6,245,4661,642,234US$2.3B1.65%8,6197162US$7.0M
Minnesota5,793,1511,523,299US$2.3B1.61%8,1107565US$6.9M
Wisconsin5,960,9751,567,428US$2.3B1.61%8,2267262US$6.8M
South Carolina5,478,8311,440,649US$2.1B1.45%8,1096965US$6.3M
Alabama5,157,6991,356,208US$1.8B1.33%6,8086556US$5.5M
Oregon4,272,3711,123,412US$1.7B1.17%6,4097770US$5.2M
Louisiana4,597,7401,208,967US$1.7B1.19%6,7136964US$5.1M
Kentucky4,588,3721,206,504US$1.7B1.19%6,1486557US$5.0M
Connecticut3,675,069966,353US$1.5B1.04%5,3668372US$4.5M
Oklahoma4,095,3931,076,876US$1.5B1.07%5,3246756US$4.4M
Utah3,503,613921,269US$1.4B1.00%4,9758371US$4.3M
Nevada3,267,467859,175US$1.3B0.88%5,6858182US$4.0M
Iowa3,241,488852,343US$1.2B0.87%4,0846956US$3.6M
Kansas2,970,606781,116US$1.1B0.79%3,7437157US$3.3M
Arkansas3,088,354812,077US$1.1B0.79%3,8916252US$3.2M
Mississippi2,943,045773,868US$1.0B0.75%3,6495949US$3.0M
New Mexico2,130,256560,147US$771.2M0.55%2,7697058US$2.3M
Idaho2,001,619526,322US$761.0M0.54%2,6427159US$2.3M
Nebraska2,005,465527,333US$743.0M0.54%2,4877156US$2.2M
West Virginia1,769,979465,413US$611.6M0.45%2,1245746US$1.8M
Hawaii1,446,146380,261US$609.8M0.41%2,3728379US$1.8M
New Hampshire1,409,032370,502US$577.8M0.40%1,8887361US$1.7M
Maine1,405,012369,445US$534.7M0.38%1,8835953US$1.6M
Rhode Island1,112,308292,479US$437.0M0.31%1,5358168US$1.3M
Montana1,137,233299,033US$430.4M0.30%1,4786454US$1.3M
Delaware1,051,917276,600US$407.6M0.29%1,4317865US$1.2M
South Dakota924,669243,140US$340.3M0.25%1,1286552US$1.0M
District of Columbia702,250184,655US$308.4M0.21%1,1809286US$925K
North Dakota796,568209,456US$293.1M0.22%9566853US$879K
Alaska733,406192,848US$290.0M0.21%9537360US$870K
Vermont648,493170,520US$249.0M0.18%8175950US$747K
Wyoming587,618154,513US$221.1M0.16%7296854US$663K

Pet household counts apply a national ownership rate of 66% of households and an average household size of 2.51 persons to state population. State-level ownership rates are not separately reported in the sources used, so this is an explicit MODELLED ESTIMATE rather than a measured value.

Investor implication

The ranking is not fixed — it is the output of weights any reader can change. What survives every reasonable weighting is a short list of high-income, high-tourism, high-density states, and that stability is the actual finding.